Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

Systematic Reviews: Guides and Standards

Collaborative support for researchers undertaking systematic reviews

Guides and Standards for Conducting Systematic Reviews

 

Reporting Standards and Checklists

  • CONSORT - An evidence-based, minimum set of recommendations for reporting RCTs. It offers a standard way for authors to prepare reports of trial findings, facilitating their complete and transparent reporting, and aiding their critical appraisal and interpretation.
  • EQUATOR - Links to a number of reporting standards. Is an international initiative that seeks to enhance reliability and value of medical research literature by promoting transparent and accurate reporting of research studies.
  • MOOSE - A checklist summarizing recommendations for reporting meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology.
  • PRISMA - (Formerly QUOROM) Provides an evidence-based minimum set of items for reporting in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. It includes a 27-item checklist and a four-phase flow diagram.
  • PRISMA-P - The minimum set of items for reporting in published systematic review and meta-analysis protocols.
  • PROSPERO - An international prospective register of systematic review protocols.
  • STARD - A checklist and a generic flow diagram for studies of diagnostic accuracy.
  • STARLITE - Standards for reporting literature searches.
  • STROBE - An international collaborative initiative that aims to strengthen the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology.
  • TREND- Specifically developed to guide standardized reporting of nonrandomized controlled trials.

 

Relevant Guides